Connect with us

Opinion

Despite two wins, fifth bowler remains India’s concern in World Cup

Makarand Waingankar

Published

on

India's two victories at the World Cup were not error free.

Toss played a crucial role in shaping the India-Australia matches outcome. When India skipper Virat Kohli won the toss he had no hesitation to bat, knowing full well the onerous task of negotiating the dangerous Mitchell Starc.

Starc swings the ball both ways and he is deceptively quick. The tall left armer is also able to extract steep bounce from the wicket. Yet under the clear blue sky at The Oval, none of that happened.

The ball neither swung nor cut, forcing Starc to immediately opt for his Plan B of bowling back of length. When a bowler bowls back of length then he sends out a message of containment rather than attack.

Both Shikhar Dhawan and Rohit Sharma took time to assert their dominance. They were not overtly aggressive but there was intent in their approach.

They slowly build up a partnership by rotating the strike. As soon as the Indian openers realised that the pitch was tailor made for batting, they shifted gears swiftly.

Virat Kohli (left) and Shikhar Dhawan forged a solid partnership in India’s win against Australia.

In limited over cricket, particularly at the World Cup, you have to assess the situation of the match quickly and act accordingly. Youhave to put pressure on bowlers because on such run-oriented tracks, anything less than 330 is easily chaseable.

In the middle overs, Indian batsmen ran like a hare, which puts the Aussies under pressure. Yet they saved atleast 25 runs, which gave them a slim chance of chasing down a huge total.

India’s vastly improved running between the wickets is due to the team management’s insistence on attaining supreme fitness levels. When the Yo-Yo test was made mandatory, criticism poured in from all quarters.

But India’s two victories have proved that its introduction has been a game changer for Indian cricket.

After a solid opening stand, Virat Kohli and Dhawan batted freely. Their task was made easier by the inconsistent Adam Zampa, who failed to strike up any rhythm, spraying the ball all over.

As the great EAS Prasanna once famously said: “Length is mandatory, line is optional.”

Modern bowlers tend to experiment too much. Some Australian bowlers also tried too many things and went for runs on a batting-friendly pitch.

The five-time world champions have a strong batting unit, studded with several all-rounders, and began well during their run chase. They benefitted from David Warner’s lucky reprieve when the ‘zing’ bails failed to be dislodged even after the ball hit the stumps.

This is the fifth time these electronic bails haven’t been dislodged on impact. It is quickly becoming a joke. The ICC must discuss this issue ASAP.

The ‘Zing’ bails have become a joke at the World Cup.

Jasprit Bumrah and Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s disciplined bowling kept the Aussies under leash. Kumar, primarily a swing bowler, bowled cunningly, and ensured that Warner is kept quiet. They cramped Warner of width.

India might have won two matches. But India’s fifth bowling option remains their biggest worry. Hardik Pandya’s medium pace and Kedar Jadhav’s slow spin form India’s fifth bowling option.

On flat pitches, if India lose the toss and the bats opts to bat, they would score heavily of these 10 overs.

India’s bowling coach Bharat Arun has to work overtime on Pandya, who has no control over line and length.

Pandya has the mentality of a fast bowler but doesn’t have the pace of one. So Arun has to instill more discipline within Pandya, India’s preferred third medium pacer.

India can’t afford Pandya to go for runs because scoring anything over 300 on English pitches won’t be a fancied task.

The spinners were not at the top of their game against Australia. Yuzvendra Chahal bowled a leg stump line to left hander Usman Khawaja. As is common knowledge, any left hander loves to sweep and bowling a leg stump line was providing fodder to Khawaja.

All-rounder Hardik Pandya’s bowling has left a lot to be desired.

But Kohli kept his cool and didn’t tinker much with Chahal’s line of attack. One important aspect of this Indian team is that they are quietly effective.

They control the game. They stick to their game plan and every member of the team are aware of their roles. This approach has paid dividends so far.

Kohli also endeared himself when he requested the Indian crowd not to boo Steve Smith for his ball tampering guilt, a mark of classic sportsmanship at international level.

Some experts call Kohli arrogant. But he is not arrogant but straight forward. He reminds me of former Australia captain Ian Chappell, who is not afraid to speak his mind and act accordingly.

Cricket Lounge

Harmony between BCCI, NADA essential for Indian cricket’s development

Makarand Waingankar

Published

on

The National Anti-Doping Agency have succeeded in bringing the BCCI under its ambit.

Mumbai: For the past one week a lot have been written on Prithvi Shaw’s back-dated eight-month ban for doping.

The poor kid ought to have known or asked before consuming cough syrup, which had terbutaline, a banned substance under BCCI’s anti-doping regulations.

Before passing a judgement on Shaw, please take due notice that he is only 19. And he is not the first nor going to be the last to consume cough syrup to get instant relief.

The education level of sportspersons is so low that they commit these ridiculous errors. But Shaw’s curious case begs certain questions to be asked.

The incident apparently occurred on February 21 in Indore where Mumbai were camped for the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy.

He went to the physio and complained of cough and cold. The physio had apparently advised Shaw to take rest, rather than taking him to a doctor.

Physios are not trained to prescribe medicines and in Shaw’s case didn’t carry out his primary duty of reporting the India player’s discomfort to a doctor.

His mistake was he first of a series of events culminating to Shaw’s retrospective ban.

Had the physio informed the manager, he would have been mentioned it in his report, preventing all hue and cry over the whole issue.

BCCI’s anti-doping official Dr. Abhijit Salve told me that physios of BCCI’s member associations routinely calls him up to inquire about medicines which are safe for prescription to players.

The list of prohibited substances gets updated routinely. Hence even a lot of doctors are sometimes caught on the wrong foot while prescribing medicines to players.

Maria Sharapova’s 15-month doping ban is a classic example of oversight, failing to report intake of meldonium, an anti-ischemic drug usually prescribed for heart conditions that was added to the prohibited list on January 1, 2016. The Russian tennis star failed a drugs test during the Australian Open, which was held from January 18-31.

Had the physio taken the little trouble of consulting Dr Salve, all of this could have been avoided.

The BCCI have conducted around 2,500 tests in the past 7-8 years. During that period only six have tested positive for banned substances.

If compared with all other sports in India, stats show that the BCCI has done a commendable job.

Unlike the BCCI, other sports federations doesn’t have a robust system in place to tackle the menace. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has expressed satisfaction at the way BCCI has handled its affairs.

But yet the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) have succeeded in bringing the BCCI under its ambit, a move borne out of greed and power, according to former hockey Olympian Dr Vece Paes, BCCI’s first anti-doping consultant and Salvi’s predecessor.

The Shaw episode forced BCCI to come under the ambit of NADA, having vehemently resisted the move earlier.

It is still unclear if the COA, the Supreme Court-appointed committee running Indian cricket, were consulted before this NADA issue.

Now that NADA has taken over all anti-doping activities in cricket, how will they go about it?

The BCCI raised issues of the quality of the dope testing kits, competence of pathologists, sample collection and the ‘Whereabouts Clause’ with regards to Out of Competition Testing, regarded as invasion of privacy and potential threat to security by top India cricketers.

Kit and pathologists are essential in doping cases. It would be very hectic for NADA as the Indian cricketers are accustomed to living a life out of their suitcases. No other sports team travel nowhere close to the cricketers.

Unless the BCCI forces its states units to appoint medicine doctors for teams, it would be difficult to drive out the menace completely in junior cricket or domestic cricket. A more robust education programme is required to tackle the issue head on at the primitive stage.

In case of Shaw, he went by the book in communicating his discomfort to the Mumbai team physio, who erred in taking matters in his own hands.

Prithvi Shaw’s doping issue should be a case study for budding Indian cricketers.

The Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) has undertaken an extensive programme of educating the parents of budding talents. Unless the parents are aware of how serious the issue is, how could we expect a teenager to know?

In India, as far as doping in India is concerned, education is at a discount. It has to go deep down, from state to district to the club level.

The concept of doping is not amply clear in Indian sports. It is not diet measurement as many believe.

Shaw’s case is a perfect case study for players, parents as well as teams. The BCCI should ensure that all state associations publish notices regarding banned substances in regional languages.

Unless that is achieved it would always be NADA vs BCCI, which would always be an uphill battle for the Board.

The players would suffer because of it and many budding talent would lose precious development time. Once any dope convict is free to play again, he would have to start from scratch.

The BCCI and NADA should work towards maintaining a harmonious existence and work in a matured way to lift the game of cricket to greater heights.

Continue Reading

Cricket Lounge

Let’s not argue; Steve Smith is a genius

Makarand Waingankar

Published

on

Steve Smith during the 1st Ashes Test at Edgbaston. Photo: @ICC

Mumbai: Over the years many star batsmen have graced the pitch. From Sir Don Bradman, Sir Len Hutton to Virat Kohli and Steve Smith these have plundered runs with elegance and class. cricket news current sports news

These batting behemoth’s all have one thing in common—the ability to read the situation, wriggle out of that tough spot and then drive their team to a position of strength.  cricket news current sports news

Steve Smith has only added to his reputation. Imagine sitting at home for a year with the stigma of being a ‘ball tamperer’ and then being thrust into an Ashes against their traditional rivals and new world champions when your team is struggling at 17/2 (first innings) and 27/2 (second innings). cricket news current sports news

It’s an unenviable situation to be in. Not many would have excelled too especially when the crowd was booing. People who saw him in Australia at the airport on his way home, after being stripped of the captaincy for ball-tampering, including some journalists, had moist eyes. He is a lovable character. cricket news current sports news

Later, he even clarified that he did not know that sandpaper was being used to rough up the ball illegally. His teammates David Warner and Cameron Bancroft were involved. The actual sequence of events, which led to them being caught is still hazy. cricket news current sports news

Smith started his career as a leg-spinner. He turned into a batsman almost overnight. In recent years, apart from Shane Warne and Stuart MacGill, Australia have produced pedestrian spinners.

Technically, he is not the best batsman to adore. Despite all his runs, no coach will tell a batsman to play like Smith. He has a weird technique, squaring up to the bowler, but it doesn’t diminish the impact of his bat with the ball, which is very precise.

He has a predominantly bottom-hand grip, commonly called the ‘3 o’clock’ grip. It restrains a batsman from free-flowing stroke-making, essentially making one a defensive player.

With that grip a batsman generally uses the bottom hand to nudge the ball. The top hand is not in operation most of the time, which prevents strokemaking freely on the offside.

But Smith is an exception who scores on both sides of the pitch with equal ease. At Edgbaston, for the last 30-40 runs during both the innings, he literally towed with the formidable English bowling, despite not having a reliable batsman at the other end as Australia had lost eight wickets by then.

Smith was virtually batting from both the ends. He has this habit of playing with tail-enders. He seems to relish the pressure. After an year’s absence from international cricket, Smith’s task was humongous. It’s like preventing a skilled worker from being in a production unit in the factory for a year!

Credit goes to his family for helping him retain his self-belief, for the sake of both Australian and world cricket.

When he came in to bat in the first innings, the reception he received was far from warm. English spectators booed him continuously, showed sandpapers. But ironically it’s the English bowlers who needed sandpapers as nothing was happening for them.

All great batsmen have had some difficulty in negotiating a particular bowler throughout their careers. Alec Bedser troubled Don Bradman. But ultimately it’s the mental toughness of these greats that help them overcome their adversaries.

No coaching manual can teach mental toughness. Either you have it or you don’t. The role of sports psychologists in making cricketers mentally tough remains debatable. cricket news current sports news

Smith is a freak, just like Kapil Dev was. Hailing from a minor cricketing centre like Chandigarh, Kapil wouldn’t have got many such matches to test his mental ability. But he was a tough nut and a supremely fit athlete.

He and MS Dhoni are classic examples of small-town smart cricketers whose mental fortitude is as high as their skill level. What they have lacked in coaching and training, they make up with their positive mentality and abundant natural ability. cricket news current sports news

Smith belongs to the same bracket of cricketers. The Australian experts initially thought that he wouldn’t last long in international cricket with an apparently suspect technique. But he is supremely consistent when it comes to run-making. He deserves all the applause that he is receiving, for making a stupendous comeback.

His partner-in-crime during sandpaper gate, Warner, hasn’t found return to the team smooth, undone by unfortunate dismissals. In the first innings he fell to a faulty decision after choosing not to review and in the second innings, he was caught while trying to leave the ball.

The Ashes couldn’t have asked for a better start. Apart from top-notch action, all cricketers have behaved impeccably throughout the five days.

The English fans would ultimately have to realise their folly in booing Smith and Warner and instead applaud their brilliance. They have accepted their mistakes and returned with renewed vigour. Welcome them back, for cricket is poorer without them!

Continue Reading

Cricket Lounge

Ravi Shastri deserves to continue as India coach

Makarand Waingankar

Published

on

There is intense speculation about the relationhsip betwen Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma.

Mumbai: Many topics are up for debate in Indian cricket circles since last week, though few of them have anything to do with cricket especially the relationship between Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma.

In the press conference both Virat Kohli and Ravi Shastri had to use strong words to convey the feeling of the team to the media. That was much required. More about it later.  cricket news

Who will be the next head coach of India? People are curious to know whether Ravi Shastri and his support staff of Sanjay Bangar (batting coach), Bharat Arun (bowling coach) and fielding coach R Sridhar would continue in their positions or not. cricket news

South African legend Jonty Rhodes has applied for the fielding coach role, while former India player Robin Singh has sought to replace Shastri at the helm.

Though internally it might be all decided but the Board has to go through an elaborate coach selection process for the sake of clarity and transparency.

In cricket, as well as any team sport, compatibility is very important, Anil Kumble learnt it the hard way.

Australia coach Justin Langer too faced a similar situation. As a cricketer, he fought for his place in the team and now he has to cope with a depressed family. This on top of motivating a team for the Ashes that is low on confidence after being beaten by England in the World Cup semis.

Living out of their suitcases while managing 30-35 cricketers throughout the year is not easy Just ask Langer’s wife, who recently broke down citing difficulty in coping with the stress of managing three kids and maintaining a jet-set lifestyle.

A coach is also a human being. It is easy to criticise the coaches but he has an unenviable task of managing a mix of different personalities, all with varying degrees of egos and associated individuality.

In 2015 he received a call from the BCCI Secretary Anurag Thakur asking him to take over Indian team as a director. Duncan Fletcher was the coach then.

Jonty Rhodes wants to be India’s fielding coach.

After 17 months the then BCCI Treasurer Ajay Shirke asked Shastri about the contract. What contract asked Shastri because the secretary had forgotten to send him the contract. For seven months he was receiving only daily allowance.

All these things are natural progression in the larger scheme of things and would be sorted out eventually when the coach is picked.  cricket news

But who would pick the coach? Each and every member of the Kapil Dev-led committee tasked with the job has conflict of interest. This conflict of interest is an issue even the best of lawyers find it difficult to interpret. Who selects whom is the basic question.

Dev, Angshuman Gaikwad and Shantaranga Swami are also tasked with judging the performance of WV Raman, the women’s team coach. It’s not an ideal situation to be in if one’s job is to pick the next men’s head coach.  sports articles

Also Read: Conflict of interest detrimental to Indian cricket’s growth

Indications suggest that Shastri and his preferred support staff will remain in the job till the World T20 next year.

Among the coaching job aspirants, Rhodes certainly poses the brightest credentials, having worked nine years as Mumbai Indians’ fielding coach. If Shastri is retained, he should have the freedom to choose his team, because he must have confidence in the ability of his support staff. It remains to be seen if he would prefer Rhodes over Sridhar.

The masala on the weekend was provided by the alleged rift between Rohit and Kohli. It’s a classic case of North vs West. sports articles

This regionalism was prevalent in the 1970s when Bishan Singh Bedi and the late Ajit Wadekar were the leaders of the two groups, respectively. They fought openly. Then later on it was Kapil Dev vs Sunil Gavaskar. Though between 1980 and ’86, the captaincy interchanged hands between these two several times.

Kohli and Rohit are India’s star performers and shouldn’t be bothered what their wives say or do on social media. Both have been performing consistently, and that’s what matters. There were times when Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis couldn’t stand the sight of each other. But it didn’t stop them from claiming wickets at will for Pakistan. sports articles  cricket news

One should expect all members of the squad to be friends or behave like a family. Talks of a possible rift is more sensational than worrying. By the time the team gets ready to face the West Indies in the Caribbean, the remaining feistiness in the dressing room would be sorted out.

Ravi Shastri (right) shares a healthy camaraderie with India skipper Virat Kohli.

These are all matured cricketers and know how much it takes to play for the country. Any rift among the wives wouldn’t come in the way of their duty to the country. But the Board must stop the cricketers and their WAGS (wives and girlfriends) from commenting on the team’s performance. sports articles

Shreyas Iyer recently criticised the selectors for his stop-start journey in international cricket. While he isn’t wrong in pointing that, but he isn’t the first cricketer to be on the waiting list.

Mohinder Amarnath and Kiran More made comebacks to the team an art. Iyer should try to follow them. He at least is within the fringes of the team.

Many cricketers in the ’60s and ’70s never even made it near the Indian team despite possessing an abundance of talent, like Padmakar Shivalkar, Rajinder Goel. sports articles cricket news

Nowadays, players are lucky to have greater chance of representing their country because of the advent of three formats. In those days, there were only Tests. So opportunities were less. sports articles cricket news

The quicker the ‘fearless’ generation of modern players realise it, the better it is for Indian cricket.

Also Read: As retirement clamour grows, do we deserve stars like Dhoni?

ICC’s ridiculous boundary count rule reduced World Cup final to ‘gully cricket’

Continue Reading

Top Picks